*** IBB - CNR *** Biostructure and Bioimaging Institute, National Research Council, Istituto di Biostrutture e Bioimmagini-CNR, Via S. Pansini, 5 Ed. 10, 80131 Naples, Italy Institute of Medical Nephrology, Medical School Federico II, University of Naples, Via Pansini, 5 Ed. 10, 80131 Naples, Italy Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Medical School Federico II, University of Naples, Via Pansini, 5 Ed. 10, 80131 Naples, Italy Diagnostic Imaging Department, Medical School Federico II, University of Naples, Via Pansini, 5 Ed. 10, 80131 Naples, Italy
Riferimenti:
Absy, M., Metreweli, C., Matthews, C., Changes in transplanted kidney volume measured by ultrasound (1987) Br J Radiol, 60, p. 52
Brown, E.D., Chen, M.Y., Wolfman, N.T., Complications of renal transplantation: Evaluation with US and radionuclide imaging (2000) Radiographics, 20, p. 607
Murphy, A., Robertson, R.J., Dubbins, P.A., Duplex ultrasound in the assessment of renal transplant complications (1987) Clin Radiol, 38, p. 229
Towsend, R.R., Tomlanovich, S.J., Goldstein, R.B., Combined Doppler and morphologic sonographic evaluation of renal transplant rejection (1990) J Ultrasound Med, 9, p. 199
Tublin, M.E., Dodd, G.D., Sonography of renal transplantation (1995) Radiol Clin North Am, 33, p. 447
Bertland, L.L., Lawson, T.L., Adams, M.B., Evaluation of renal transplants with pulsed Doppler duplex sonography (1982) J Ultrasound Med, 1, p. 215
London, N.J., Aldoori, M., Bates, J.A., Monitoring renal allograft rejection with duplex sonography (1992) Clin Transplant, 6, p. 407
Troell, S., Berg, U., Johansson, B., Comparison between renal parenchymal sonographic volume, renal parenchymal urographic area, glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow in children (1998) Scand J Urol Nephrol, 22, p. 207
Brandt, T.D., Neiman, H.L., Dragoski, M.J., Ultrasound assessment of normal renal dimensions (1982) J Ultrasound Med, 1, p. 49
Edell, S.L., Kurtz, A.B., Rifkin, M.D., Normal renal ultrasound measurements (1990) Atlas of Ultrasound Measurements, p. 146. , Goldberg BB, Kurtz AB, editors. Chicago: Mosby-Year Book
Hricak, H., Lieto, R.P., Sonographic determination of renal volume (1983) Radiology, 148, p. 311
Jones, T.B., Riddick, L.R., Harpen, M.D., Ultrasonographic determination of renal mass and renal volume (1983) J Ultrasound Med, 2, p. 151
Emamian, S.A., Nielsen, M.B., Pedersen, J.F., Intraobserver and interobserver variations in sonographic measurements of kidney size in adult volunteers: A comparison of linear measurements and volumetric estimates (1995) Acta Radiol, 36, p. 399
Bakker, J., Olree, M., Kaatee, R., Renal volume measurements: Accurancy and repeatability of US compared with that of MR imaging (1999) Radiology, 211, p. 623
Solving, J., Ekberg, H., Hansen, F., Accuracy of non-invasive ultrasonic volume measurements on human kidney transplants. Presentation of a new forlula (1998) Nephron, 80, p. 188
Luft, A.R., Skalei, M., Welte, D., Reliability and exactness of MRI-based volumetry: A phantom study (1996) J Mag Reson Imaging, 6, p. 700
Caldwell, S.H., De Lange, E.E., Gaffey, M.J., Accuracy and significance of pretransplant liver volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (1996) Liver Transpl Surg, 2, p. 438
Mitchell, J.R., Karlik, S.J., Lee, D.H., Computer-assisted identification and quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions in MR imaging volumes in the brain (1994) J Magn Reson Imaging, 4, p. 197
Mancini, M., Daniele, S., Raffio, T., Intra and interobserver variability of renal allograft ultrasound volume and resistive index measurements (2005) Radiol Med, 109, p. 385
Chul Kim, J., Animal study of renal volume measurement on abdominal CT using digital image processing: Preliminary report (2004) Clin Imaging, 28, p. 135
Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement (1986) Lancet, 1, p. 307
Partik, B.L., Stadler, A., Schamp, S., 3D versus 2D ultrasound: Accuracy of volume measurements in human cadaver kidneys (2002) Invest Radio, 37, p. 489
Riccabona, M., Nelson, T.R., Pretorius, D.H., Distance and volume measurement using three-dimensional ultrasonography (1995) J Ultrasound Med, 14, p. 881
Nelson, T.R., Downey, D.B., Pretorius, D.H., (1999) Three Dimensional Ultrasound, , Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Brown, E. D., Chen, M. Y., Wolfman, N. T., Complications of renal transplantation: Evaluation with US and radionuclide imaging (2000) Radiographics, 20, p. 607
Towsend, R. R., Tomlanovich, S. J., Goldstein, R. B., Combined Doppler and morphologic sonographic evaluation of renal transplant rejection (1990) J Ultrasound Med, 9, p. 199
Tublin, M. E., Dodd, G. D., Sonography of renal transplantation (1995) Radiol Clin North Am, 33, p. 447
Bertland, L. L., Lawson, T. L., Adams, M. B., Evaluation of renal transplants with pulsed Doppler duplex sonography (1982) J Ultrasound Med, 1, p. 215
London, N. J., Aldoori, M., Bates, J. A., Monitoring renal allograft rejection with duplex sonography (1992) Clin Transplant, 6, p. 407
Brandt, T. D., Neiman, H. L., Dragoski, M. J., Ultrasound assessment of normal renal dimensions (1982) J Ultrasound Med, 1, p. 49
Edell, S. L., Kurtz, A. B., Rifkin, M. D., Normal renal ultrasound measurements (1990) Atlas of Ultrasound Measurements, p. 146. , Goldberg BB, Kurtz AB, editors. Chicago: Mosby-Year Book
Jones, T. B., Riddick, L. R., Harpen, M. D., Ultrasonographic determination of renal mass and renal volume (1983) J Ultrasound Med, 2, p. 151
Emamian, S. A., Nielsen, M. B., Pedersen, J. F., Intraobserver and interobserver variations in sonographic measurements of kidney size in adult volunteers: A comparison of linear measurements and volumetric estimates (1995) Acta Radiol, 36, p. 399
Luft, A. R., Skalei, M., Welte, D., Reliability and exactness of MRI-based volumetry: A phantom study (1996) J Mag Reson Imaging, 6, p. 700
Caldwell, S. H., De Lange, E. E., Gaffey, M. J., Accuracy and significance of pretransplant liver volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (1996) Liver Transpl Surg, 2, p. 438
Mitchell, J. R., Karlik, S. J., Lee, D. H., Computer-assisted identification and quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions in MR imaging volumes in the brain (1994) J Magn Reson Imaging, 4, p. 197
Bland, J. M., Altman, D. G., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement (1986) Lancet, 1, p. 307
Partik, B. L., Stadler, A., Schamp, S., 3D versus 2D ultrasound: Accuracy of volume measurements in human cadaver kidneys (2002) Invest Radio, 37, p. 489
Nelson, T. R., Downey, D. B., Pretorius, D. H., (1999) Three Dimensional Ultrasound, , Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Purpose. Sonographic measurement of renal volume is one of the parameters used in the diagnosis of renal transplant dysfunction and in follow-up of patients with renal transplant. The aim of this study was to compare the prolate ellipsoid formula with a new formula in calculating the volume of a transplanted kidney. Methods. The renal volumes in 24 patients with a stable renal transplant were determined sonographically with the ellipsoid formula and via helical CT with the voxel-count method, which is the gold standard. A new formula that uses renal length and the cross-sectional area at the maximum transverse section has been evaluated in a small series of transplanted kidneys. Results. Renal volume was underestimated with the sonographic ellipsoid formula and the new formula. The new formula yielded the lowest underestimation of the mean renal volume, and the measurements obtained with it were not significantly different from those obtained with CT. Conclusions. The use of sonography is appropriate for accurate calculation of renal volume, and the new formula that uses only 2 ultrasound parameters best represents the volume of a renal transplant. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Malvindi MA, Greco A, Conversano F, Figuerola A, Corti M, Bonora M, Lascialfari A, Doumari HA, Moscardini M, Cingolani R, Gigli G, Casciaro S, Pellegrino T, Ragusa A * MR Contrast Agents(127 visite) Small Animal Imaging, 2011 Jul 8; 21(13): 2548-2555. Impact Factor:1.784 DettagliEsporta in BibTeXEsporta in EndNote
Ntziachristos V, Cuénod CA, Fournier L, Balvay D, Pradel C, Siauve N, Clement O, Jouannot E, Lucidarme O, Vecchio SD, Salvatore M, Law B, Tung C-H, Jain RK, Fukumura D, Munn LL, Brown EB, Schellenberger E, Montet X, Weissleder R, Clerck ND, Postnov A * Tumor Imaging(127 visite) Textbook Of In Vivo Imaging In Vertebrates (ISSN: 9780-4700), 2007 Jul 16; 1: 277-309. Impact Factor:1.148 DettagliEsporta in BibTeXEsporta in EndNote
Hesse B, Tagil K, Cuocolo A, Anagnostopoulos C, Bardies M, Bax J, Bengel F, Busemann Sokole E, Davies G, Dondi M, Edenbrandt L, Franken P, Kjaer A, Knuuti J, Lassmann M, Ljungberg M, Marcassa C, Marie PY, Mckiddie F, O'connor M, Prvuolovich E, Underwood R * 3. 0 T perfusion MR imaging(308 visite) Rivista Di Neuroradiologia (ISSN: 1120-9976), 2004; 17(6): 807-812. Impact Factor:0.023 DettagliEsporta in BibTeXEsporta in EndNote
608 Records (565 escludendo Abstract e Conferenze). Impact factor totale: 1824.815 (1694.345 escludendo Abstract e Conferenze). Impact factor a 5 anni totale: 2019.053 (1868.132 escludendo Abstract e Conferenze).
ibb.cnr.it