Preliminary Results of a Simplified Breast MRI Protocol to Characterize Breast Lesions: Comparison with a Full Diagnostic Protocol and a Review of the Current Literature
Preliminary Results of a Simplified Breast MRI Protocol to Characterize Breast Lesions: Comparison with a Full Diagnostic Protocol and a Review of the Current Literature(86 visite) Romeo V, Cuocolo R, Liuzzi R, Riccardi A, Accurso A, Acquaviva A, Buonocore R, Imbriaco M
Acad Radiol (ISSN: 1076-6332, 1878-4046electronic), 2017 Jun 01; N/D: N/D-N/D.
Tipo di articolo: Journal Article,
Impact factor: 2.11, Impact factor a 5 anni: 2.221
Url: Non disponibile.
Parole chiave: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Abbreviated Protocol, Breast Cancer,
Affiliazioni:
*** IBB - CNR *** Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University "Federico II," Via Pansini 5, Naples 80123, Italy., Institute of Bio-structures and Bio-imaging, National Research Council (CNR), Naples, Italy., Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Surgery, University "Federico II," Naples, Italy., Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University "Federico II," Via Pansini 5, Naples 80123, Italy. Electronic address: mimbriaco@hotmail.com.,
Riferimenti:
Non disponibile.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether a simplified breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol consisting of a localizer, one precontrast sequence, and three time-point postcontrast sequences (at 28 seconds, 84 seconds and 252 seconds after the contrast agent administration) is suitable for the characterization of breast lesions as compared to a full diagnostic protocol (FDP). This study also aimed to review the current literature concerning abbreviated breast MRI protocols and offer an alternative protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast magnetic resonance (MR) examinations with detected breast lesions of 98 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Two expert radiologists in consensus reviewed the simplified breast protocol (SBP) first and only thereafter the regular FDP, recording a diagnosis for each detected lesion for both protocols. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of the SBP compared to the standard FDP. A revision of the previously reported abbreviated breast magnetic resonance protocols was also carried out. RESULTS: A total of 180 lesions were identified; of these, 110 (61%) were malignant and 70 (39%) were benign. Of the 110 malignant lesions, 86 (78%) were invasive ductal carcinoma, 18 (16%) were invasive lobular carcinoma, and 6 (6%) were ductal carcinoma in situ. Areas under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curves for the SBP vs the FDP were equivalent (0.98 vs 0.99, respectively; P = 0.76). The SBP could be performed in approximately 6 minutes and 58 seconds, compared to 14 minutes and 48 seconds for the FDP. CONCLUSIONS: An SBP protocol including a late postcontrast time point is accurate for the characterization of breast lesions and was comparable to the standard FDP protocol, allowing a potential reduction of the total acquisition and interpretation times.
Antonini A, Vitale C, Barone P, Cilia R, Righini A, Bonuccelli U, Abbruzzese G, Ramat S, Petrone A, Quatrale R, Marconi R, Ceravolo R, Stefani A, Lopiano L, Zappia M, Capus L, Morgante L, Tamma F, Tinazzi M, Colosimo C, Guerra UP, Valzania F, Fagioli G, Distefano A, Bagnato A, Feggi L, Anna S, Maria Teresa Rosaria De Cr, Nobili F, Mazzuca N, Baldari S, Eleopra R, Bestetti A, Benti R, Varrone A, Volterrani D, Massa R, Stocchi F, Schillaci O, Dore F, Zibetti M, Castellano G, Battista SG, Giorgetti G * The relationship between cerebral vascular disease and parkinsonism: The VADO study(200 visite) Parkinsonism Relat D (ISSN: 1353-8020, 1873-5126, 1873-5126electronic), 2012; 18(6): 775-780. Impact Factor:3.274 DettagliEsporta in BibTeXEsporta in EndNote
Malvindi MA, Greco A, Conversano F, Figuerola A, Corti M, Bonora M, Lascialfari A, Doumari HA, Moscardini M, Cingolani R, Gigli G, Casciaro S, Pellegrino T, Ragusa A * MR Contrast Agents(130 visite) Small Animal Imaging, 2011 Jul 8; 21(13): 2548-2555. Impact Factor:1.784 DettagliEsporta in BibTeXEsporta in EndNote
Ntziachristos V, Cuénod CA, Fournier L, Balvay D, Pradel C, Siauve N, Clement O, Jouannot E, Lucidarme O, Vecchio SD, Salvatore M, Law B, Tung C-H, Jain RK, Fukumura D, Munn LL, Brown EB, Schellenberger E, Montet X, Weissleder R, Clerck ND, Postnov A * Tumor Imaging(130 visite) Textbook Of In Vivo Imaging In Vertebrates (ISSN: 9780-4700), 2007 Jul 16; 1: 277-309. Impact Factor:1.148 DettagliEsporta in BibTeXEsporta in EndNote
Cusanno F, Cisbani E, Colilli S, Fratoni R, Garibaldi F, Giuliani F, Gricia M, Lucentini M, Magliozzi ML, Santarivenere F, Torrioli S, Cinti MN, Pani R, Pellegrini R, Simonetti G, Schillaci O, Del Vecchio S, Salvatore M, Majewski S, De Vincentis G, Scopinaro F * Results of clinical trials with SPEM(126 visite) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A, 2007 Feb 1; 497(1): 46-50. Impact Factor:3.221 DettagliEsporta in BibTeXEsporta in EndNote
Hesse B, Tagil K, Cuocolo A, Anagnostopoulos C, Bardies M, Bax J, Bengel F, Busemann Sokole E, Davies G, Dondi M, Edenbrandt L, Franken P, Kjaer A, Knuuti J, Lassmann M, Ljungberg M, Marcassa C, Marie PY, Mckiddie F, O'connor M, Prvuolovich E, Underwood R * 3. 0 T perfusion MR imaging(312 visite) Rivista Di Neuroradiologia (ISSN: 1120-9976), 2004; 17(6): 807-812. Impact Factor:0.023 DettagliEsporta in BibTeXEsporta in EndNote
403 Records (362 escludendo Abstract e Conferenze). Impact factor totale: 1305.067 (1189.305 escludendo Abstract e Conferenze). Impact factor a 5 anni totale: 1425.107 (1287.918 escludendo Abstract e Conferenze).
ibb.cnr.it